Saturday, June 1, 2019

Animal Testing (speech Outline) -- essays research papers fc

Specific Purpose To persuade my audience that animal examination is wrong and how other safer alternatives should be taken. primaeval Idea By going the extra mile in using safer alternatives when experimenting with animals will not only prevent conflicts from pro-life activists, it will minimize lawsuits and moral philosophy will be preserved.IntroductionI.     Okay I got a riddle I made up for the class.A.     What was once cute and furry but becomes a bloody rotted mess?B.     You guys give up?C.     Well the answer to this question is an animal that has undergone chemical testing. II.     I know that wasnt too unmated but I needed some sort of attention-grabber and this hit home on the question of my topic whether animal testing is right or wrong.A.      later on all, the question whether animals should be time-tested is often hotly debated.B.  &nbs p  Through intense research I have discovered that the issue on whether animals should be experimented upon, or vivisection, has cropped up in history as early as the 17th century.III.     Although animal testing is much less frequent today than in the past, I will reinforce the idea that alternatives to animal testing should be preserved today. A.     I will starting time explain the conflicts in the past where animal testing caused many problems. B.     Then I will reinforce the solution to animal testing by discussing the various alternatives that can be taken. (Transition Let us first look at the problem of animal testing.) BodyI.     As I have mentioned, the question on animal testing was posed even as early as the 17th century, according to the All For tools Newsletter.A.     According to this newsletter, Philosopher Jeremy Bentham rejected philosopher Rene Descartes t heory that because animals have no reasoning that humans have, they therefore cannot feel pang or suffering.1.     But Bentham went further in this issue, rejecting Descartes idea because the idea of reasoning was irrelevant on the moral issue whether animals should be tested. 2.     Benthams philo... ... be tested upon by dangerous chemicals?BibliographySmith, Taylor. Animal Testing - Alternatives - Cruelty- kick Living. All For Animals Newsletter. Issue 1, March 1998.Grigg, Bill. NIH News Release. 28 Dec. 1999 last revision. < <a href="http//www.nih.gov/news/pr/dec99/niehs-28.htm">http//www.nih.gov/news/pr/dec99/niehs-28.htm > 1999.Adams, Johnathan. Animal Welfare Act and Regulations. August 22, 2000 last update < <a href="http//www.nal.usda.gov/awic/legislat/usdaleg1.htm">http//www.nal.usda.gov/awic/legislat/usdaleg1.htm > 1996.USDA Agrees to Regulate More Research Animals, Including Mice. October 3, 2000 l ast update < <a href="http//www.cnn.com/2000/NATURE/10/03/research.animals.ap/index.html">http//www.cnn.com/2000/NATURE/10/03/research.animals.ap/index.html > 1990.Cruelty Free CompaniesChoose to Be Cruelty-Free. < <a href="http//www.allforanimals.com">http//www.allforanimals.com > 2000.ANIMAL TESTING. May 12, 1999 last update. < <a href="http//vm.cfsan.fda.gov/dms/cos-205.html">http//vm.cfsan.fda.gov/dms/cos-205.html > 1996.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.